Comments on: Fluent NHibernate 1.0 RTM http://jagregory.com/writings/fluent-nhibernate-10-rtm/ Monkeying with the code Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:30:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: James Gregory http://jagregory.com/writings/fluent-nhibernate-10-rtm/comment-page-1/#comment-47073 James Gregory Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:30:46 +0000 http://blog.jagregory.com/?p=313#comment-47073 Please visit the <a href="http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate" rel="nofollow">mailing list</a> and raise your issue there, we had several discussions about ints and discriminators and I thought the issue was resolved (or at least a work-around available). Please visit the mailing list and raise your issue there, we had several discussions about ints and discriminators and I thought the issue was resolved (or at least a work-around available).

]]> By: Pedro G. Dias http://jagregory.com/writings/fluent-nhibernate-10-rtm/comment-page-1/#comment-47072 Pedro G. Dias Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:23:14 +0000 http://blog.jagregory.com/?p=313#comment-47072 I'm *almost* convinced. I'm working in a place where we're already using the traditional mapping, but fluent is absolutely desired, however, we're severely stuck with the issue of SubclassMap and integer ad discriminator. We use orders as a base class and have specific implementations: pickOrders, putawayOrders, refillOrders, etc, these are all mapped to an int "OrderType" that also has to live with legacy code (we can't change it). Once this issue is resolved, we should be able to move to Fluent, for now, it's not doable for the same reason. Other than that, hands down in a monster salute, this is really cool stuff :) I’m *almost* convinced. I’m working in a place where we’re already using the traditional mapping, but fluent is absolutely desired, however, we’re severely stuck with the issue of SubclassMap and integer ad discriminator.

We use orders as a base class and have specific implementations: pickOrders, putawayOrders, refillOrders, etc, these are all mapped to an int “OrderType” that also has to live with legacy code (we can’t change it).

Once this issue is resolved, we should be able to move to Fluent, for now, it’s not doable for the same reason.

Other than that, hands down in a monster salute, this is really cool stuff :)

]]> By: Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #423 http://jagregory.com/writings/fluent-nhibernate-10-rtm/comment-page-1/#comment-35040 Reflective Perspective - Chris Alcock » The Morning Brew #423 Tue, 01 Sep 2009 07:42:07 +0000 http://blog.jagregory.com/?p=313#comment-35040 [...] Fluent NHibernate 1.0 RTM - James Gregory announces the Version 1.0 RTM release of Fluent NHibernate, the easy way of creating your NHibernate mappings using a fluent interface and convention over configuration principles. This release has a number of changes (some significant) so check out the release notes before you try to use it. [...] [...] Fluent NHibernate 1.0 RTM – James Gregory announces the Version 1.0 RTM release of Fluent NHibernate, the easy way of creating your NHibernate mappings using a fluent interface and convention over configuration principles. This release has a number of changes (some significant) so check out the release notes before you try to use it. [...]

]]> By: mookid on code » Getting started with Fluent NHibernate http://jagregory.com/writings/fluent-nhibernate-10-rtm/comment-page-1/#comment-34409 mookid on code » Getting started with Fluent NHibernate Sat, 29 Aug 2009 06:57:04 +0000 http://blog.jagregory.com/?p=313#comment-34409 [...] EDIT: Oh yeah, and now it’s here. [...] [...] EDIT: Oh yeah, and now it’s here. [...]

]]>